Friday, March 29, 2013
Thursday, March 28, 2013
Saturday, March 16, 2013
Emissions calculation
Tally of Emissions
Via direct flight, total emissions would be 2.664
melb-bris = 0.1 (shared car, 3 people)
bris-townsville = .08 (shared car, 3 people)
townsville - darwin = .225 (shared car, 2 people)
darwin - bali = .267 (FLIGHT)
bali - surabaya = .01 (Ferry, bus)
surabaya - yogya = .01 (Train)
yogyakarta - jakarta = .01 (Train)
jakarta - batam = .02 (Ferry)
batam - singapore = .001 (Ferry)
singapore - kuala lumpur = .02 (Train)
kl - bangkok = .09 (Bus)
bangkok - kolkata = .233 (FLIGHT)
kolkata - delhi = .09* (Train)
delhi - lahore = .07* (Train)
lahore - quetta = .03* (Train)
quetta - zahedan = .02* (Bus)
zahedan - bandar-abbas = .01* (Bus)
bandar-abbas - tehran = .02* (Train)
tehran - van = .02* (Train)
van - sirince = .05* (Train/Ferry)
sirince - kavala = .005* (Bus/Ferry)
kavala - bucharest = .02* (Train)
bucharest - berlin = .11* (Train)
*projected
total = 1.511
---end---
HYPOTHETICALS
(after the jump)
Thursday, March 14, 2013
Sections of the journey to Europe which cannot be done by land, and why
From Kolkata, India
6.11pm
During my six months of research for this project, I struck two sections on my desired route which are uncrossable by land. Interestingly, although I am passing through India, Pakistan and Iran, supposedly the least receptive areas of the world (if you listen to the media), these countries are actually fine to pass through by land. And when I say 'fine', I mean there are certainly risks, but they are not as high as you might think.
No, the two sections which prevent overland travel between Europe and Australia are:
- Myanmar. This country has been under the rule of a military government for a long time, and as a result still suffers from a high degree of lawlessness, especially in the Eastern region, where there are disputes with the native Rohingya people, who are Islamic (unlike the Buddhist majority). As a result, whilst it is periodically possible to enter into Myanmar from Thailand, you cannot exit to India or Bangladesh.*
- Australia. Australia is a first world country which will protect its borders at all costs from foreigners fleeing from war-torn countries. As a result, you can only travel to Indonesia by air. There are boats, but it is not possible to get on them.
Which of these seems rational? A war-torn country with various post-colonial problems and an oppressed minority seeking their freedom? Or a country which tries to prevent foreigners from entering it because... why? Maybe they will seek asylum and suck our horrible social services system dry?
Maybe we just don't care.
There are many ironies here. I speak some Indonesian, the reason being that I studied it when I was in Primary and later High school. I studied it for 7 years. During that time, I never had any idea why I was studying it. In a country school in Victoria, it was the only language option. Something about 'improving relations' or 'economic ties'.
However, in a country that is inherently xenophobic and navel-gazing, just because you speak someone's language apparently does not equate to letting them into your country.
*Note: you can still cross into India via private yacht from Phuket to the Andaman Islands, a distance of 500km. This is possible from Phuket, if you stalk the marinas for long enough. I tried for a week. Next time.
6.11pm
During my six months of research for this project, I struck two sections on my desired route which are uncrossable by land. Interestingly, although I am passing through India, Pakistan and Iran, supposedly the least receptive areas of the world (if you listen to the media), these countries are actually fine to pass through by land. And when I say 'fine', I mean there are certainly risks, but they are not as high as you might think.
No, the two sections which prevent overland travel between Europe and Australia are:
- Myanmar. This country has been under the rule of a military government for a long time, and as a result still suffers from a high degree of lawlessness, especially in the Eastern region, where there are disputes with the native Rohingya people, who are Islamic (unlike the Buddhist majority). As a result, whilst it is periodically possible to enter into Myanmar from Thailand, you cannot exit to India or Bangladesh.*
- Australia. Australia is a first world country which will protect its borders at all costs from foreigners fleeing from war-torn countries. As a result, you can only travel to Indonesia by air. There are boats, but it is not possible to get on them.
Which of these seems rational? A war-torn country with various post-colonial problems and an oppressed minority seeking their freedom? Or a country which tries to prevent foreigners from entering it because... why? Maybe they will seek asylum and suck our horrible social services system dry?
Maybe we just don't care.
There are many ironies here. I speak some Indonesian, the reason being that I studied it when I was in Primary and later High school. I studied it for 7 years. During that time, I never had any idea why I was studying it. In a country school in Victoria, it was the only language option. Something about 'improving relations' or 'economic ties'.
However, in a country that is inherently xenophobic and navel-gazing, just because you speak someone's language apparently does not equate to letting them into your country.
*Note: you can still cross into India via private yacht from Phuket to the Andaman Islands, a distance of 500km. This is possible from Phuket, if you stalk the marinas for long enough. I tried for a week. Next time.
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Article from Yogya Daily
Article Text:
SLEMAN - Richard Pettifer, seorang sutradara dan artis pertunjukkan dari
australia menunjukkan kebolehannya bermain pantomim di Warkop Lidah Ibu, Jalan
STM Pemangunan, mrican, Selasa (20/2), Tampil dihadapan belasan penonton,
Richard mengusung tema People Spoke atau orang berbicara.
Dalam pementasan berdurasi selama 40 menit itu, Richard menyuarakan jeritan
orang orang yang tertindas. Tema tersebut diambil Richard karena merasa
prihatin dengan orang yang merasa dirinya merdeka. Menurut dia, kesejahteraan yang
dimiliki oleh orang sejatinya belum menjamin kemerdekaan sosorang. "Di
Australia orang orang berpikir dirinya merdeka namun bagiku itu keliru.
Misalnya, mereka berpikir kesejahahteraan adalah kebebasan. Tapi bagiku
kesejahteraan bukanlah sebuah kebebasan. Kadangkala kebabasan seseorang hadir
dengan konsekuensi tidak bebasnya orang lain" terangnya kepada Harian
Jogja.
Pandangan Richard perihal kebebasan itu direpresentasikan dengan melakukan
berberapa gerakan unik saat melakukan pertunjukan pantomim. Ia bakan memasukkan
aksi para biksu Tibet membakar diri dalam melakukan perlawanan terhadap
pemerintah tiran. Dalam aksinya itu, ia sempat menyalakan korek gas untuk
ditempelkan kepakaian yang ia kenakan. "ide ini sebenarnya spontan karena
aku dapat ide waktu sehingga tidak sempat latihan khusus. Api itu kemudian
sempat mengenai tubuhku" ujarnya sembari terkekeh.
Kebatangan Richard ke Jogja tersebut merupakan salah satu rangkaian turnya
ke beberapa salah satu rangkaian turnya ke beberapa negara dunia. Setelah
tampil di Jogya, secara berurut ia akan menyambangi Iran, Turki, rumania dan
terakhir Jerman.
---
Translation to English
SLEMAN - Richard Pettifer, a director and performance artist from Australia
showed skill in pantomime at Warkop Mother
Tongue, Jalan STM Pemangunan, Mrican, Tuesday (20/2), Shown in front of dozens
of spectators, Richard’s theme is People Spoke.
In a staging lasted for 40 minutes, Richard voiced the cry of the oppressed. The theme is taken as Richard was concerned with people who feel themselves independent. According to him, the welfare of which is owned by someone does not guarantee freedom. "In Australia people think themselves free, but for me this is wrong. For example, someone might think prosperity is freedom. But to me, prosperity not a freedom. This liberation comes with consequences for both the individual and for others – and these are not independent" he told Daily Jogja.
Richard's view is about freedom represented by a unique couple of movements when performing pantomime. He even put the action of the Tibetan monk burning himself to take the fight against government tyranny. In that action, he had struck a gas to be attached to clothes he was wearing. "This idea is actually spontaneous because I have no special training. The fire was all around me" he said as he chuckled.
The arrival of Richard to Yogyakarta is one of a series of his tour to several countries of the world. After performing in Yogyakarta, sequentially he will be visited Iran, Turkey, Romania and finally Germany.
---
Comment:
This is only a brief overview of the work I was doing and, as usual with the media, sometimes does a disservice through simplification (necessary because of those pesky ever-reducing column sizes). I particularly like the line "This idea is actually spontaneous because I have no special training. The fire was all around me" It brings to mind a kind of devilish amateur appropriation that I hope I was not guilty of in the performance, especially of something so personal as the suicide of a Tibetan monk, which is not a chuckle. Having said that, the journalist bothered to engage with the idea rather than fetishising me with 'foreign superstar' status, which is more than can be said than many Australian media sources in the way they report on visitors.
Many thanks to Kurnianto for penning the article.
In a staging lasted for 40 minutes, Richard voiced the cry of the oppressed. The theme is taken as Richard was concerned with people who feel themselves independent. According to him, the welfare of which is owned by someone does not guarantee freedom. "In Australia people think themselves free, but for me this is wrong. For example, someone might think prosperity is freedom. But to me, prosperity not a freedom. This liberation comes with consequences for both the individual and for others – and these are not independent" he told Daily Jogja.
Richard's view is about freedom represented by a unique couple of movements when performing pantomime. He even put the action of the Tibetan monk burning himself to take the fight against government tyranny. In that action, he had struck a gas to be attached to clothes he was wearing. "This idea is actually spontaneous because I have no special training. The fire was all around me" he said as he chuckled.
The arrival of Richard to Yogyakarta is one of a series of his tour to several countries of the world. After performing in Yogyakarta, sequentially he will be visited Iran, Turkey, Romania and finally Germany.
---
Comment:
This is only a brief overview of the work I was doing and, as usual with the media, sometimes does a disservice through simplification (necessary because of those pesky ever-reducing column sizes). I particularly like the line "This idea is actually spontaneous because I have no special training. The fire was all around me" It brings to mind a kind of devilish amateur appropriation that I hope I was not guilty of in the performance, especially of something so personal as the suicide of a Tibetan monk, which is not a chuckle. Having said that, the journalist bothered to engage with the idea rather than fetishising me with 'foreign superstar' status, which is more than can be said than many Australian media sources in the way they report on visitors.
Many thanks to Kurnianto for penning the article.
Monday, February 25, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




